(1)
Where anything made or done after the commencement of this Act is void under this Chapter as a fraudulent preference of a person interested in property mortgaged or charged to secure the company’s debt, the person preferred shall, without prejudice to any liabilities or rights arising apart from this provision, be subject to the same liabilities, and have the same rights, as if he had undertaken to be personally liable as surety for the debt, to the extent of the charge on the property or the value of his interest, whichever is the less, and the value of the said person’s interest shall be determined as at the date of the transaction constituting the fraudulent preference, and shall be determined as if the interest were free of all encumbrances other than those to which the charge for the company’s debt was the subject.
(2)
Where for the purposes of this section, application is made to the Court with respect to any payment on the ground that the payment was fraudulent preference of a surety or guarantor, the court shall have jurisdiction to determine any questions with respect to the payment arising between the person to whom the payment was made and the surety or guarantor, and to grant relief in respect thereof, though it is not necessary to do so for the purposes of the winding-up, and for that purpose may give leave to bring in the surety or guarantor as a third party as in the case of an action for the recovery of the sum paid.
(3)
Subsection (2) applies, with the necessary modifications, in relation to transactions other than the payment of money, as it applies in relation to payments.