Case: protests over waste disposal: An environmental group protested against the target company’s waste disposal, while the board said no law was broken. The marking key rewards weighing reputation and compliance against the board’s claim.
Cases: Each case asks for one report to a named reader, with two requirements and appendices. Notice how every pack mixes emails, financial statements and industry data.
Examiner’s report: The report names the missing disclaimer as a pitfall. Compare your cover page with the disclaimer in this topic.
Examiner’s reports: Both ask candidates to practise report writing. Use the five summary headings from the marking key to practise on each case.
Key: rising inventories and debtors: The key rewards professional judgement on figures that disagree with the story. Interpret them with why and so what.
Marking key: performance concerns: The key asks for judgement on areas of concern, such as rising inventories and receivables despite falling performance. Compare it with the income statement questions.
Requirement 1: Mago Pharmaceuticals financial analysis: The key lists rising inventories and receivables despite falling performance. Test your own analysis against the worked case in this topic.
Requirement 1: discontinuing a product line: The solution shows a negative contribution for one line, and the key adds other factors to consider. Rework it using the worked example in this topic.
Requirement 1: multi-stage dividend valuation: The client wanted a value per share using a multi-stage dividend model, at a 10% discount rate. The key also asks for comment on the model and its shortcomings. Rebuild the table using the worked case.
Requirement 1: product line contribution: The case lists sales and costs for three product lines and says no fixed costs go if one is dropped. Practise separating contribution from allocated fixed costs.
Requirement 1: ratios against industry averages: The case supplies industry figures for return on assets, return on equity, net profit margin, debt to equity, receivable days, asset turnover and per-share figures. Calculate each one and compare it.
Requirement 1: valuing Mago Pharmaceuticals: The client asked for a fair value and advice on the price to pay, though the market price was thought unreliable. Compare the asset-based range with the dividend value in the next topic.
The Sadeco case: Each report names the same weak spots: report writing, scepticism, executive summaries and the choice of tool. Read all four and tick off the ten differentiators against them.
Professional level · Case Study
Case Study · November 2014
Every objective and theory question in this paper, and the topic notes to revise each one.
1 questions1 theory13 topics to revise
Source: ICAN Pathfinder, Professional Level Examination, Case Study, November 2014
November 2014 diet
0 objective and 1 theory0 objective1 theory
| No. | Section | Marks | Covers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q- | Case: protests over waste disposal: An environmental group protested against the target company’s waste disposal, whi... |
Theory questions Written questions
•
Theory questionWritten paper
The full wording of this question has not been added yet. This summary shows what it tests and where to revise it.
Source: ICAN Pathfinder, Professional Level Examination, Case Study, November 2014
Source and reference. These questions come from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN) Pathfinder for the Professional Level Examination, Case Study, November 2014. When you use them, please cite the source, for example: ICAN Pathfinder, Professional Level Examination, Case Study, November 2014. Each question carries its own reference and a button to copy it.