Foreign Exchange Risk: Transaction, Translation and Economic

A company that deals across borders carries a risk that does not show up in its business plan: the exchange rate.

A sale priced at a fixed number of dollars may be worth more or fewer naira by the time the customer pays; a foreign subsidiary’s assets may be worth more or less in the parent’s accounts at the end of the year than at the start; and a currency that rises or falls over the years can change which companies can compete.

These are three different risks, with different effects on cash and profit and different remedies: transaction risk, translation risk and economic risk. Telling them apart is the first step in managing them, since a technique that deals with one (a forward contract for a payment due in three months) does nothing for another (a long-term loss of competitiveness).

Since 2023, when Nigeria unified its exchange rates, the naira has moved a great deal against the dollar, and importers, exporters and companies with dollar debts have felt each type of risk.

This topic explains the three risks, how to measure transaction exposure and the net position in each currency, how translation differences arise on consolidation, how economic exposure affects the competitiveness and profit of a business, and why risk runs both ways, with worked examples. The next topic covers the causes of exchange rate movements.

The syllabus asks candidates to describe the different types of foreign exchange risk. Read foreign exchange rates and quotations first.

Transaction risk

Transaction risk arises when a transaction in a foreign currency is not settled at once. Between the date of the deal and the date of payment or receipt, the exchange rate may move, so that the domestic-currency value of the cash differs from what was expected. The exposure lasts from the date of the commitment (the order, the invoice, the loan) until the cash settles.

It arises on credit sales and purchases, foreign currency loans and deposits, dividends and royalties to be received, committed future transactions and, in a contingent form, tenders and bids priced in foreign currency.

An importer

A Nigerian manufacturer orders components for $200,000, payable in 60 days. At the order the rate is ₦1,335/$1, so the expected cost is 200,000 × 1,335 = ₦267m. If the dollar strengthens to ₦1,400 at settlement, the cost is ₦280m, a loss of ₦13m; if the naira strengthens to ₦1,300, the cost is ₦260m, a gain of ₦7m.

An exporter

A Nigerian exporter sells goods for $150,000 on 90 days’ credit when the rate is ₦1,335: expected receipt ₦200.25m. If the dollar weakens to ₦1,290 by settlement, the receipt is ₦193.5m, a loss of ₦6.75m. If its normal margin is 10% (₦20.0m on the sale), the exchange loss takes away a third of the profit (6.75 ÷ 20.0 = 34%) and the margin falls to 6.6%.

For companies that trade on thin margins, the exchange difference can be as large as the profit on the deal.

Rule: the exporter (a seller of foreign currency) loses when the foreign currency weakens; the importer (a buyer) loses when it strengthens. The risk is two-way: in each example the rate might have moved the other way and produced a gain.

Most hedging techniques give up the chance of the gain in order to remove the chance of a loss, because a trading company wants to protect its margin, not to speculate.

Net exposure

A company with several items in the same currency may not be exposed on each: receivables, cash and loans of one currency offset each other. The net exposure in a currency is its foreign currency assets less its foreign currency liabilities. With dollar receivables of $500,000 and cash of $50,000 against payables of $320,000 and a dollar loan of $200,000, the net exposure is 550 − 520 = $30,000 long (an asset position, which loses if the dollar weakens).

A 1% fall in the dollar would cost 1% × 30,000 × 1,335 = ₦400,500. Only the net position needs to be hedged (see the topic on internal hedging).

Translation risk

Translation risk arises for a group with foreign subsidiaries. The subsidiary’s statements are in its local currency; on consolidation they must be translated into the parent’s currency, and exchange rate movements create differences.

Under International Accounting Standard (IAS) 21, the assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate, income and expenses at the rate on the transaction date or an average rate. The resulting exchange difference goes to other comprehensive income and is accumulated in equity (the translation reserve), not through profit.

Example: a UK subsidiary has net assets of £5.0m at the start of the year, when £1 = ₦1,700, so ₦8,500m. It earns profit of £1.2m, translated at the average rate of ₦1,750: ₦2,100m. Net assets at the end are £6.2m, translated at the closing rate of ₦1,800: ₦11,160m. The opening net assets plus profit, translated as above, give 8,500 + 2,100 = ₦10,600m, so the translation difference is 11,160 − 10,600 = ₦560m, a gain recorded in other comprehensive income.

Translation risk does not change the cash flows of the group: it is a paper gain or loss. It may nevertheless matter: it affects reported equity and ratios such as gearing, and may breach loan covenants; managers’ performance is often measured in the group currency.

Groups with foreign currency net assets may reduce the exposure by borrowing in that currency, so that the loan offsets the assets. But this is a hedge of the accounting position and has costs.

Economic risk

Economic risk (operating exposure) is the effect of long-term changes in exchange rates on the competitiveness of a business and the present value of its future cash flows. A currency that gains value over time makes the exports of that country dearer and imports cheaper; so a company that produces in a country whose currency rises loses competitiveness against those in countries with falling currencies.

It affects both a firm that exports and one that sells only at home, if it competes with imports or buys its inputs abroad.

Example: a Nigerian beverage producer sells only in Nigeria, in naira, with revenue of ₦1,000m. Its costs are ₦400m for imported ingredients priced in dollars, ₦400m of local costs and a profit of ₦200m. If the naira weakens by 10% against the dollar, imported costs rise to ₦440m and profit falls to 1,000 − 440 − 400 = ₦160m, a drop of 20%, unless prices rise; a price increase of 4% (₦40m) would restore the profit but may reduce sales.

The firm has no foreign currency receivable or payable on its books at the date, so the risk does not appear as a transaction exposure; it is strategic.

Economic exposure cannot be removed by a forward contract. It is managed by operating decisions: spreading production and sourcing across several countries and currencies (so that costs and revenues are in the same currency), pricing policy, local sourcing of inputs, matching foreign currency revenues with costs and borrowing in the currency of the revenues, and diversification of markets.

The three compared

The ideas in more depth

Why risk runs both ways

An exchange rate can move up or down, so exposure produces gains as often as losses. Management hedges not because losses are more likely than gains, but because it wants to know what it will receive or pay, to plan and to protect the margin that it priced into the deal.

A company that does not hedge is, in effect, speculating on exchange rates, which is not what its shareholders invest in it for, though they can diversify away some of the risk themselves. In practice, firms hedge those exposures that are large relative to profit or that threaten covenants, and leave small ones.

Why a forward contract does not cure economic risk

A forward contract fixes a rate for a known amount on a known date. Economic exposure is about unknown future amounts over many years and about how customers and competitors react to the exchange rate, so no contract of a year or two can cover it. The remedy is in how the company is organised: where it produces, whom it buys from, in which currency it prices and borrows.

Sources and references

• International Accounting Standard (IAS) 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates (functional currency; translation at closing and average rates; differences in other comprehensive income) and International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9 on hedge accounting. Foreign currency rules for Nigerian companies are in the Central Bank of Nigeria Foreign Exchange Manual.

These points are stated as at 5 November 2026.

Worked examples

1. Cost.
   200,000 × 1,400 = ₦280m against 267m expected.
2. Loss. ₦13m.

1. Net.
   550 − 520 = $30,000 long.

1. Closing.
   6.2 × 1,800 = ₦11,160m.
2. Difference.
   11,160 − 10,600 = ₦560m.

How to answer in the exam

• Identify the type of risk from the facts: a future settlement, a consolidation, or a long-term trend.
• Work out who loses: an exporter if the foreign currency weakens, an importer if it strengthens.
• Calculate the effect on cash or profit and on the margin.
• Recommend a response suited to the risk (hedge, match, or restructure operations).

Common mistakes in the exam

• Calling a consolidation difference a cash loss.
• Applying a forward contract to economic risk.
• Getting the direction of loss wrong for an importer or exporter.
• Ignoring that risk is two-way.
• Hedging the gross amounts instead of the net exposure.
• Forgetting that a company with only domestic sales can have economic exposure.

Quick revision

• Transaction: cash, until settlement; translation: paper, at consolidation; economic: strategic, long term.
• Exporter loses if the foreign currency weakens; importer if it strengthens.
• Net exposure = foreign assets − liabilities.
• Translation differences go to other comprehensive income.

Practice questions

These are original questions written in the style of the Institute’s exams. Try each one before you open the answer. Section A is a recall check, because the paper itself is written.

Recall check: multiple choice

Section B style: written questions

A further written question

Model answers

Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will check it.