Sign inSign upSign in
Menu

Environmental Management Accounting and Sustainability in Business

ICAN Skills, Performance Management. Syllabus area B: Advanced costing techniques.

11 min read · Updated 8 November 2026

Download this topic

In this part

A plastics company in Lagos pays a fine for discharging untreated effluent. The fine is booked in administration costs, the cost of the effluent treatment that would have avoided it is in the capital budget as a pure expense. The loss of two customers who will no longer buy from a polluter appears nowhere. The accounts say the treatment plant does not pay.

They are wrong, because they count its cost and miss its benefits. Environmental management accounting exists to put these costs and benefits in front of management.

This topic explains why environmental issues matter to business, how conventional management accounting misleads, what environmental management accounting is and where it is applied, the three pillars of sustainability and the triple bottom line, why environmental accounting is important, and the Nigerian rules that now apply. It builds on the throughput accounting topic.

The next topic covers environmental costs, the methods of accounting for them and the management accountant’s role.

In 30 seconds

Environmental management accounting (EMA) gives managers financial and non-financial information to support environmental decisions. It complements conventional management accounting and does not replace it. Conventional techniques may under-estimate or ignore the cost of poor environmental behaviour (fines, taxes, lost land value, law suits, lost customers), over-estimate the cost of improvement and under-estimate its benefits. Main applications: estimating environmental costs, budgeting, product pricing, investment appraisal and estimating savings from environmental projects.

A sustainable business balances people, planet and profit, the three pillars, and may report on a triple bottom line. Environmental accounting reveals hidden costs, promotes sustainable decisions, informs policy, encourages responsibility and supports long-term planning. In Nigeria the Climate Change Act 2021 and the IFRS S1 and S2 roadmap now apply. Full marks come from linking each idea to a decision and showing the effect on the numbers.

The purpose of environmental management accounting

For some companies environmental issues are significant for strategy and for cost. Poor behaviour can bring fines for pollution, environmental taxes, loss of land value and the cost of law suits. It can also change customers’ attitudes, because buyers increasingly take environmental factors into account. EMA gives management information to handle these issues. Traditional techniques can:

  • under-estimate or even ignore the cost of poor environmental behaviour;
  • over-estimate the cost of improving environmental practice; and
  • under-estimate the benefits of improving it.

EMA provides financial and non-financial information and complements conventional methods. Its main applications are:

  • Estimating annual environmental costs, for example the cost of waste control.
  • Budgeting. Including environmental costs and savings in operating and capital budgets.
  • Product pricing. Making sure the price recovers the environmental costs a product causes.
  • Investment appraisal. Including clean-up costs at the end of a project and the environmental costs and benefits of the project itself.
  • Estimating savings from environmental projects, such as lower energy use or waste.

A framework for EMA

EMA can be organised by whether the information is monetary (cost accounting, budgets, relevant costing, life cycle costing, target costing) or physical (flows of materials and energy, environmental impacts), by whether it looks at the past or the future, by whether the focus is short or long term, and by whether it is routine or ad hoc.

Monetary EMA, for example, covers environmental cost accounting and the budgets; physical EMA covers material and energy flow accounting, assessment of impacts and long-term physical planning.

People, planet and profitThree overlapping pillars of sustainability: people for fair practice to staff, community and customers; planet for energy, emissions and waste; profit for economic value after the cost of all inputs. The triple bottom line reports all three.Peoplefair work practicescommunity, customershealth and safetyPlanetenergy and emissionswaste and recyclingrenewable resourcesProfiteconomic value createdafter all inputs, includingthe cost of capitalTriple bottom line report: social, environmental and economic results together

Sustainability and the triple bottom line

To succeed over the long term a business must be sustainable: profitable, but also mindful of non-financial aspects. Sustainability is described by performance in three areas: economic (financial), environmental and social. These are the three pillars, or the three Ps, people, planet and profit. People means fair and beneficial practice for employees, the community and customers.

Planet means sustainable practice: energy efficiency, less pollution, renewable materials and energy, less waste and more recycling. Profit is the economic value created after the cost of all inputs, including capital. A business is unlikely to survive in the long term unless it considers people and planet as well as profit.

Stakeholders now include the community at large as well as owners, employees, customers and suppliers. Society can become poorer even while companies grow rich, if the damage to the environment and society is not counted. A successful business must be financially secure, minimise its negative environmental impact and meet the expectations of society.

Public companies report financial results in annual statements, and many also report social and environmental goals in a strategic or sustainability report.

The traditional bottom line is the profit or loss at the foot of the income statement. A gold mine can show a profit while it pollutes the water supply, harming people and livestock: the statements show the profit, not the cost to society. The triple bottom line adds social and environmental bottom lines to the economic one, which brings sustainability into business decisions.

Why environmental accounting matters

  • It reveals hidden costs. Pollution, deforestation and carbon emissions are not normally in the financial statements. Environmental accounting brings these externalities into view.
  • It promotes sustainable decisions. When management sees the full environmental cost of its operations, it is more likely to adopt greener practice.
  • It informs public policy. Governments can design better regulation and incentives if they know the true environmental effect of economic activity.
  • It encourages corporate responsibility. Shareholders and consumers demand transparency, and environmental accounting supports reporting on sustainability.
  • It supports long-term planning. It gives data for forecasting and planning sustainable development, balancing growth with environmental health.

Environmental accounting analyses how an organisation’s operations, products or services affect the environment and then shares that information with others, including by showing environmental costs in the financial records.

Nigerian environmental and climate rules as at November 2026

  • Climate Change Act 2021, signed on 18 November 2021. It sets a framework for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions between 2050 and 2070, creates the National Council on Climate Change, and requires a carbon budget and a National Climate Change Action Plan every five years. It applies to public and private entities. Private entities with 50 or more employees must designate a climate change or environmental sustainability officer and take part in the emission reduction targets, and a private entity that fails to meet its reduction targets may be fined by the Council.
  • IFRS S1 and S2. Public interest entities must report sustainability-related and climate-related information for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2028 under the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria’s amended 2026 roadmap, with SMEs from 2030.

These rules mean that environmental data is no longer optional for many Nigerian companies, so the management accountant’s systems must capture it. Confirm current regulator notices before advising a real client.

Sources and references

  • Climate Change Act 2021.
  • Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria, Roadmap Report for the Adoption of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards in Nigeria (amended 2026); IFRS S1 and IFRS S2.

These points are stated as at 6 November 2026.

Layouts

  1. Environmental project appraisal. Net annual benefit = material or energy saved + disposal costs avoided + fines or contingent costs avoided − running costs. NPV = net benefit × annuity factor − cost. Show the appraisal with and without the contingent benefits.
  2. Emissions. Quantity × emission factor (given), summed to a carbon footprint in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (divide kilograms by 1,000).
  3. Intensity. Tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent ÷ revenue in ₦ million.

Money is in ₦ million, emissions in tonnes, and each answer is rounded once at the end.

Worked examples

Example 1: appraisal with environmental benefits. A company is considering a waste recycling plant costing ₦60.0m with a life of six years and a cost of capital of 15% (annuity factor 3.7845). Each year it will recover material worth ₦14.0m, avoid disposal charges of ₦6.5m and avoid fines and clean-up risks estimated at ₦3.5m. Running costs are ₦5.0m a year. Required: the NPV with and without the avoided fines, and the payback.

  1. With all benefits.
    Net annual benefit 14.0 + 6.5 + 3.5 − 5.0 = ₦19.0m.
    Present value 19.0 × 3.7845 = ₦71.91m.
    NPV 71.91 − 60.00 = +₦11.91m.
    Payback 60 ÷ 19.0 = 3.16 years.
  2. Without the avoided fines.
    Net annual benefit 14.0 + 6.5 − 5.0 = ₦15.5m.
    Present value 15.5 × 3.7845 = ₦58.66m.
    NPV 58.66 − 60.00 = −₦1.34m.
  3. Comment. A conventional appraisal that ignores contingent environmental costs would reject the plant. Including them reverses the decision. The estimate of the fines is uncertain, so the company should test it, but leaving it out treats it as zero, which is the most unlikely value.

Example 2: a carbon footprint. A company used 1,200,000 kWh of grid electricity (emission factor 0.45 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent per kWh) and 150,000 litres of diesel (2.68 kg per litre). Revenue was ₦3,000m. It aims to cut its emissions by 10%. Required: the footprint, the intensity and the target.

  1. Electricity.
    1,200,000 × 0.45 = 540,000 kg = 540 tonnes.
  2. Diesel.
    150,000 × 2.68 = 402,000 kg = 402 tonnes.
  3. Footprint.
    540 + 402 = 942 tonnes.
  4. Intensity.
    942 ÷ 3,000 = 0.31 tonnes per ₦ million of revenue.
  5. Target.
    10% × 942 = 94.2 tonnes to save, leaving 847.8 tonnes.

Expect variants: different life or rate, a carbon price to attach to emissions, an investment that cuts emissions and cost together, or a non-financial table to be interpreted.

Common mistakes

  • Treating EMA as a replacement for management accounting. It complements it.
  • Leaving contingent environmental costs out of an appraisal. Show the result both ways.
  • Confusing the three pillars with three bottom lines in a list with no examples. Give an indicator for each.
  • Mixing kilograms and tonnes. Divide kilograms by 1,000.
  • Presenting environmental accounting as voluntary in Nigeria without mentioning the Climate Change Act and the 2028 reporting date.

Quick revision

  • EMA: financial and non-financial information for environmental decisions; complements conventional methods.
  • Traditional methods: ignore or under-estimate environmental costs and benefits, over-estimate improvement cost.
  • Applications: annual environmental costs, budgeting, pricing, investment appraisal, savings.
  • Three pillars: people, planet, profit; triple bottom line.
  • Importance: hidden costs, sustainable decisions, policy, responsibility, long-term planning.
  • Nigeria: Climate Change Act 2021 (officer for entities with 50 or more employees); IFRS S1 and S2 from 2028.

How the marks are earned

  • Explain: the purpose of EMA and the weaknesses of conventional methods.
  • Appraise: the layout, each line, with and without environmental items, and a recommendation.
  • Discuss: importance, with an example for each point.

Practice questions

These are original questions, written in the style of the Skills examination. Work each one before you open the answer.

Recall check: multiple choice

Question 1. Environmental management accounting provides:

  1. Only tax advice
  2. Financial and non-financial information to support environmental decisions
  3. Only audit reports
  4. Only legal advice
Show the answer

B. It complements conventional accounting.

Question 2. Traditional management accounting may:

  1. Over-estimate the cost of poor behaviour
  2. Ignore all costs
  3. Under-estimate the cost of improvement
  4. Under-estimate the cost of poor environmental behaviour
Show the answer

D. It may also under-estimate the benefits of improvement.

Question 3. Environmental management accounting:

  1. Complements conventional methods and does not replace them
  2. Replaces all other accounting
  3. Is only for banks
  4. Is only for audits
Show the answer

A. It adds environmental information.

Question 4. The three pillars of sustainability are:

  1. Price, place, promotion
  2. Input, process, output
  3. People, planet, profit
  4. Cost, volume, profit
Show the answer

C. Also called the three Ps.

Question 5. The triple bottom line adds to the financial bottom line:

  1. Social and environmental bottom lines
  2. Two tax lines
  3. Two profit lines
  4. Nothing
Show the answer

A. It brings sustainability into decisions.

Question 6. A carbon footprint is:

  1. The size of a factory
  2. Total emissions expressed as carbon dioxide equivalent
  3. A tax
  4. A kind of fuel
Show the answer

B. Other gases are converted to carbon dioxide equivalent.

Question 7. Under the Climate Change Act 2021, a private entity with 50 or more employees must:

  1. Close
  2. Pay no tax
  3. Designate a climate change or environmental sustainability officer
  4. Stop using electricity
Show the answer

C. It must also take part in emission reduction targets.

Question 8. Environmental accounting helps because it:

  1. Hides costs
  2. Removes the need for reports
  3. Is only about profit
  4. Reveals hidden costs such as pollution that statements ignore
Show the answer

D. It also promotes sustainable decisions.

Question 9. Sustainability means meeting present needs:

  1. At any cost
  2. Ignoring the future
  3. Without compromising the ability of future generations to meet theirs
  4. Only for shareholders
Show the answer

C. It balances short-term profit with long-term responsibility.

Question 10. Mandatory IFRS S1 and S2 reporting for public interest entities in Nigeria applies to periods beginning on or after:

  1. 1 January 2028
  2. 1 January 2023
  3. 1 January 2025
  4. 1 January 2031
Show the answer

A. Small and medium-sized entities follow from 2030.

Section B style: written questions

Question 11 (10 marks). (a) Explain why conventional management accounting may give misleading information about environmental issues. (4 marks) (b) State FIVE applications of environmental management accounting. (5 marks) (c) Define the triple bottom line. (1 mark)

Question 12 (15 marks). A company is considering a recycling plant costing ₦48.0m, life five years, cost of capital 16% (annuity factor 3.2743). Each year it will recover material worth ₦12.5m, avoid disposal charges of ₦5.0m and avoid fines and clean-up risks of ₦2.5m. Running costs are ₦4.0m a year.

(a) Calculate the net annual benefit with and without the avoided fines. (4 marks) (b) Calculate the NPV in each case. (6 marks) (c) Advise the board. (5 marks)

Question 13 (20 marks). A company used 2,000,000 kWh of electricity (0.45 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent per kWh), 220,000 litres of diesel (2.68 kg per litre) and 60,000 litres of petrol (2.31 kg per litre). Revenue was ₦4,070m. It aims to cut total emissions by 15%.

(a) Calculate the emissions from each source and the total in tonnes. (6 marks) (b) Calculate electricity’s share of the total and the emissions per ₦ million of revenue. (4 marks) (c) Calculate the reduction required and the target total. (3 marks) (d) Discuss why environmental accounting is important and the Nigerian rules that apply. (7 marks)

Model answers

Show the model answer to Question 11

(a) Conventional techniques may under-estimate or ignore the cost of poor environmental behaviour, such as fines, taxes and law suits (1). They may over-estimate the cost of improvement (1). They may under-estimate the benefits of improvement, such as lower waste and a better reputation (1). So decisions based on them may reject worthwhile environmental projects (1).

(b) Any five: estimating annual environmental costs; budgeting; product pricing; investment appraisal; estimating savings from environmental projects; reporting (1 each).

(c) A framework reporting economic, social and environmental performance as three bottom lines (1).

Show the model answer to Question 12

(a)

  1. With all.
    12.5 + 5.0 + 2.5 − 4.0 = ₦16.0m.
  2. Without fines.
    12.5 + 5.0 − 4.0 = ₦13.5m (4).

(b)

  1. With all.
    16.0 × 3.2743 = 52.39
  2. less 48.00 = +₦4.39m (3).
  3. Without fines.
    13.5 × 3.2743 = 44.20
  4. less 48.00 = −₦3.80m (3).

(c) The plant is acceptable only if the avoided fines and clean-up risk are counted. A conventional appraisal would reject it. The fines estimate is uncertain, so test it: the plant breaks even if the avoided fines are at least about ₦1.16m a year. Also consider the benefit to reputation and compliance with the Climate Change Act, and the reliability of the recovery estimate (5).

Show the model answer to Question 13

(a)

  1. Electricity 2,000,000 × 0.45 = 900,000 kg = 900 tonnes.
  2. Diesel 220,000 × 2.68 = 589,600 kg = 589.6 tonnes.
  3. Petrol 60,000 × 2.31 = 138,600 kg = 138.6 tonnes.
  4. Total 1,628.2 tonnes (6).

(b)

  1. Electricity share 900 ÷ 1,628.2 = 55.3% (2).
  2. Intensity 1,628.2 ÷ 4,070 = 0.40 tonnes per ₦ million (2).

(c)

  1. Reduction 15% × 1,628.2 = 244.2 tonnes
  2. target total 1,628.2 − 244.2 = 1,384.0 tonnes (3).

(d) Importance: reveals hidden costs; promotes sustainable decisions; informs policy; encourages responsibility and transparency; supports long-term planning (up to 4). Nigeria: Climate Change Act 2021 with its net-zero framework, carbon budget and the duty on private entities with 50 or more employees to designate an officer and join emission reduction targets; mandatory IFRS S1 and S2 reporting for public interest entities from periods beginning on or after 1 January 2028 (up to 3).

Pathfinder on Environmental management accounting and sustainability

These are the ICAN Pathfinder questions that test this topic. ICAN owns the questions and the suggested solutions, so we point you to them and do not copy them. Open your Pathfinder, attempt each question under exam conditions, then check your answer against the notes above.

November Diet, 2024: Question 6 (15 marks)

Engine/assembly transfer price ranges (avoidable cost, idle capacity, full capacity); environmental management accounting meaning and reasons to report in Nigeria.

Revise first: The purpose of environmental management accounting

Source: ICAN Pathfinder, Performance Management. Diets covered: March/July Diet, 2020 to May Diet, 2026. All 13 diets in the Pathfinder are mapped.

Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will check it.

Where this fits

See every past question on Performance Management and the topic each one tests in the Pathfinder question finder.

This course builds on Management Accounting. After it, move on to Strategic Financial Management.

All Performance Management topics

You are reading topic 15 of 77.

  1. Information systems in organisations: role, costs and benefits01
  2. Internet, intranet, wireless technology and networks in business02
  3. Information needs at strategic, tactical and operational levels03
  4. TPS, MIS, EIS, ERP and CRM systems compared04
  5. Social and ethical issues in strategy and the management accountant’s data role05
  6. Big data principles and the big data pyramid06
  7. Big data, data mining and analytics: uses, benefits, challenges and risks07
  8. Activity based costing: cost pools, cost drivers and calculations08
  9. Activity based costing compared with traditional absorption costing09
  10. Target costing: principles and calculating the target cost10
  11. Managing the target cost gap and target costing in services11
  12. Life cycle costing: product life cycle stages and costs12
  13. Life cycle cost and profit calculations, and the benefits of life cycle costing13
  14. Throughput accounting: theory of constraints and the throughput accounting ratio14
  15. Environmental management accounting and sustainability in business15 here
  16. Environmental costs: methods, challenges and the management accountant’s role16
  17. Relevant costs and revenues, and opportunity cost17
  18. Relevant costs for specific decisions: materials, labour, equipment and overheads18
  19. Break-even analysis and margin of safety for Skills level decisions19
  20. Contribution to sales ratio, target profit and target revenue20
  21. Break-even charts and profit-volume charts21
  22. Multi-product CVP analysis and its limitations22
  23. Limiting factors: allocating a single scarce resource23
  24. Linear programming: formulation and graphical solution24
  25. Linear programming: slack and shadow prices25
  26. Price elasticity of demand and the factors that influence price26
  27. Demand and cost functions: profit-maximising price and output27
  28. Cost-based pricing: cost-plus and relevant-cost pricing28
  29. Market-based pricing: skimming, penetration and other strategies29
  30. Make-or-buy and outsourcing decisions30
  31. One-off contracts, shutdown and further processing of joint products31
  32. Reducing uncertainty: research, simulation and sensitivity analysis32
  33. Expected values and decision rules: maximax, maximin and minimax regret33
  34. Decision trees for multi-stage decisions34
  35. Value of perfect and imperfect information35
  36. Budgetary systems and types of budget: choosing the right one36
  37. Preparing fixed and flexed budgets37
  38. Rolling, activity-based, functional and master budgets38
  39. The beyond budgeting model: benefits and problems39
  40. Participation, negotiation and ethics in budgeting40
  41. High-low method and cost estimation for budgets41
  42. Correlation, regression and time series for budgeting and forecasting42
  43. Learning curve: learning rate and learning effect43
  44. Learning curve in budgeting: steady state and limitations44
  45. Standard costing: uses, how standards are set and types of standard45
  46. Basic variances: material, labour and idle time46
  47. Material mix and yield variances47
  48. Labour mix and yield variances48
  49. Sales mix and quantity variances49
  50. Planning and operational variances: revised budget, sales, market size and market share50
  51. Planning and operational variances for materials and labour51
  52. Overhead variances and reconciling budgeted and actual profit at Skills level52
  53. Behavioural effects of variances: motivation, JIT and TQM53
  54. Profitability ratios and financial performance measures54
  55. Liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios55
  56. Non-financial performance indicators56
  57. Short-termism and financial manipulation of results57
  58. Sustainability and ESG performance measures58
  59. The balanced scorecard59
  60. The Fitzgerald and Moon building block model60
  61. Performance measurement in not-for-profit organisations61
  62. Value for money as a public sector objective62
  63. Divisional performance: return on investment and residual income63
  64. Economic value added (EVA)64
  65. Transfer pricing methods and the optimal transfer price65
  66. Transfer pricing: problems, tax and repatriation of funds66
  67. Value chain analysis for performance management67
  68. Complex business structures: alliances, joint ventures and supply chains68
  69. The performance pyramid69
  70. Value-based management70
  71. Corporate failure and life cycle issues71
  72. The Z-score and other quantitative failure models72
  73. The Argenti model and qualitative failure prediction73
  74. Preventing corporate failure and performance improvement strategies74
  75. Current developments in management accounting75
  76. Benchmarking and target setting in the public sector76
  77. The changing role of the management accountant and contemporary issues77
See the whole course

Get the complete Performance Management notes

Download as PDF or Word

  • Every topic as PDF and Word, ready to print
  • Edit it in Word or print the PDF. No retyping.
Get this course

Reading stays free. Access lasts 12 months. Pay by card, bank transfer, USSD or QR through Paystack. Your name and email appear on every page of your files. Read our Refund Policy.

PracticeNext topic