Sign inSign upSign in
Menu

Sales Variances: Price, Volume, Mix and Quantity Variances Explained

ICAN Skills, Performance Management. Syllabus area D: Budgeting and control.

10 min read · Updated 8 November 2026

Download this topic

In this part

A beverage company budgets to sell 600 cartons a week across three products: a cheap cola, a mid-priced juice and a premium water. In the week it sells 660 cartons, which beats the budget, but most of the extra sales are of the cola, the product with the lowest margin.

The sales manager points to the 60 extra cartons and asks for credit; the finance director points to the margin and asks whether the extra volume has really helped. A single sales volume variance cannot settle the argument.

It must be split into a sales quantity variance, the effect of selling more or fewer cartons in total, and a sales mix variance, the effect of selling a different combination of products from the budgeted one.

This topic starts with the two basic sales variances, sales price and sales volume, then explains the quantity and mix variances, the units method and the line-by-line method, the effect of costing system (contribution or profit), and how to interpret the result. It builds on the earlier topic on labour mix and yield variances. The next topic covers planning and operational variances: sales, market size and market share.

In 30 seconds

Sales variances are reported to management to reconcile budget and actual profit; they are not recorded in the cost ledger. Sales price variance = actual sales revenue − (actual units sold × standard price). Sales volume variance = (actual units sold − budgeted units) × standard profit per unit in absorption costing, or standard contribution per unit in marginal costing; with several products, the sum for each product.

It splits into a sales quantity variance = (total actual units − total budgeted units) × budgeted average standard contribution (or profit) per unit, and a sales mix variance: share the total actual units in the budgeted proportions, compare with the actual units of each product, and value the difference at that product’s standard contribution (or profit); the units total zero.

Mix + quantity = volume. Line by line:

  • actual units in actual mix at standard contribution
  • actual units in budgeted mix at standard contribution (difference = mix)
  • budgeted units at the budgeted contribution (difference = quantity)

A favourable mix means more of the higher-contribution products were sold. The split is useful only where management can influence the mix. Full marks come from correct units, the correct unit value and an interpretation.

Sales price and sales volume variances

Sales variances are included in variance reports to help to reconcile budgeted with actual profit and to assess sales performance. Unlike cost variances they are not recorded in the cost accounts. There are two basic ones.

  • Sales price variance = actual sales revenue − (actual units sold × standard selling price). Favourable if units were sold above the standard price.
  • Sales volume variance = (actual units sold − budgeted units) × the standard profit per unit under standard absorption costing (sometimes called the sales volume profit variance), or the standard contribution per unit under marginal costing. Favourable if more were sold than budgeted.

Possible causes. Price: market conditions; unplanned discounts to major customers; competitors’ price cuts. Volume: demand higher or lower than expected; a strong or weak sales force; an advertising campaign that did better or worse than planned; a competitor leaving the market; fashion changing.

The two variances may be related: a price rise gives a favourable price variance but may reduce volume; a price cut to win sales gives an adverse price variance and, hopefully, a favourable volume variance.

Quantity and mix variances

When a company sells several products, the sales volume variance is found for each product and added. It can then be analysed further, since there are two differences between budget and actual: the total number of units sold, and the combination of products. The total variance splits into a quantity variance and a mix variance.

The sales quantity variance

The quantity variance shows the effect on profit of the total quantity sold being different from budget, assuming the budgeted mix. In that case the average standard contribution per unit would be the same as budgeted. It is (total actual units − total budgeted units) × the budgeted weighted average standard contribution (or profit) per unit.

The sales mix variance

The mix variance shows the effect on profit of the actual mix being different from the budgeted mix.

  1. Find the budgeted mix as percentages of total budgeted units.
  2. Apply these to the total actual units: this gives the units of each product that would have been sold in the budgeted mix.
  3. For each product: actual units − units in the budgeted mix. The total across products is zero.
  4. Multiply by the product’s standard contribution (or profit) per unit and add.

It is favourable if the company sold more of the products with higher margins and fewer of the lower. Mix + quantity = volume.

The line-by-line method

Start with actual units in the actual mix at standard contribution. Then actual total units in the budgeted mix at standard contribution: the difference is the mix variance. Then budgeted total units at the budgeted average contribution, which equals the budget contribution: the difference is the quantity variance.

The second line can be found quickly as the total actual units × the budgeted average contribution per unit only if the mix is as budgeted; otherwise use each product.

Splitting the sales volume varianceThree horizontal bars of contribution. The top bar is actual units in the actual mix, the middle is the same total units in the budgeted mix, and the bottom is the budgeted units in the budgeted mix. The gap between the top two is the mix variance and between the lower two the quantity variance. Together they are the volume variance.Actual units, actual mixActual units, budgeted mixBudgeted units, budgeted mixmixquantityvolume = mix + quantity

Interpretation and limits

A favourable mix with an adverse quantity variance shows that the company sold fewer units but richer ones; the opposite shows volume bought with margin. The mix variance is meaningful only where products are related and management can influence the mix (through promotion, pricing and sales incentives); for unrelated products, a different mix may simply reflect demand.

Sales staff paid a bonus on volume may push the easiest, lowest-margin product, giving a favourable quantity variance and an adverse mix variance. The mix variance also ignores differences in selling price between products that have already been taken into account in the standard contribution.

Layouts for sales variances

  1. Price: actual revenue less actual units × standard price.
  2. Volume by product: (actual − budget) × standard contribution (or profit); total.
  3. Quantity: (total actual − total budget) × budgeted average contribution.
  4. Mix table: actual; units in budgeted mix; difference; × standard contribution; total.
  5. Check: mix + quantity = volume.

Money is in naira and each answer is rounded once, at the end.

Worked examples

Example 1: price and volume. A product has a budget of 5,000 units, a standard price of ₦120 and a standard cost of ₦90 (standard profit ₦30). In the period 5,300 units were sold for ₦630,000. Required: the price and volume variances.

  1. Price.
    5,300 × 120 = 636,000 should have been received; actual 630,000; ₦6,000 A.
  2. Volume.
    (5,300 − 5,000) = 300 units F × 30 = ₦9,000 F.

Example 2: quantity and mix. Budget (marginal costing): A 300 units at a standard contribution of ₦40, B 200 at ₦60, C 100 at ₦90 (600 units; contribution ₦33,000; average ₦55 a unit). Actual sales: A 250, B 280, C 130 (660 units). Required: the volume, quantity and mix variances.

  1. Volume by product.
    A: (250 − 300) × 40 = 2,000 A.
    B: (280 − 200) × 60 = 4,800 F.
    C: (130 − 100) × 90 = 2,700 F.
    Total ₦5,500 F.
  2. Quantity.
    (660 − 600) × 55 = ₦3,300 F.
  3. Mix. Budgeted mix 50%, 33.3%, 16.7%. Of 660 units: A 330; B 220; C 110.
    A: 250 − 330 = 80 A × 40 = 3,200 A.
    B: 280 − 220 = 60 F × 60 = 3,600 F.
    C: 130 − 110 = 20 F × 90 = 1,800 F.
    Total ₦2,200 F; units sum to zero.
  4. Check.
    3,300 F + 2,200 F = 5,500 F.
  5. Line by line.
    Actual units in actual mix: 250 × 40 + 280 × 60 + 130 × 90 = 10,000 + 16,800 + 11,700 = 38,500.
    Actual units in budgeted mix: 330 × 40 + 220 × 60 + 110 × 90 = 13,200 + 13,200 + 9,900 = 36,300; difference 2,200 F (mix).
    Budget: 600 × 55 = 33,000; difference 3,300 F (quantity).
  6. Comment. More units were sold (quantity favourable) and the extra sales were of the higher-margin B and C rather than A (mix favourable), so the sales team has done well on both counts.

If the company used absorption costing, replace the standard contribution by the standard profit per unit in each calculation.

Expect variants: a percentage given for the budgeted mix, absorption costing profit per unit, a question requiring the whole operating statement, and a comparison of the sales manager’s claim with the finance view.

Sales mix and quantity variances using contribution ratios, and how to interpret them

If the question gives a contribution to sales ratio, the standard contribution per unit = price × ratio. Example. Premium wash ₦2,000 at 40% = ₦800; Basic ₦800 at 50% = ₦400. Budget 3,000 and 2,000 (total 5,000); actual 3,100 and 3,900 (total 7,000). Actual total in budgeted mix: Premium 7,000 × 60% = 4,200; Basic 2,800. Mix variance = (actual − actual in budget mix) × standard contribution: Premium (3,100 − 4,200) × 800 = ₦880,000 A; Basic (3,900 − 2,800) × 400 = ₦440,000 F; total ₦440,000 A. Quantity variance = (actual in budget mix − budget) × standard contribution: Premium (4,200 − 3,000) × 800 = ₦960,000 F; Basic (2,800 − 2,000) × 400 = ₦320,000 F; total ₦1,280,000 F.

Together they equal the sales volume variance (₦840,000 F). Interpretation. When incomes fall, customers trade down to the cheaper service: more units are sold (favourable quantity) but with a lower contribution each (adverse mix); say so, and add price and cost effects.

Pitfalls: work out the standard proportions on the actual total; use the monthly fixed cost for a monthly profit (not the annual figure); and note that a mix variance matters because it affects profit, can be used to judge sales managers and informs decisions on which product to promote, although it is meaningful mainly when the products are substitutes.

Common mistakes

  • Using the budgeted units instead of the actual total units when finding the budgeted-mix units.
  • Valuing quantity at one product’s contribution instead of the budgeted average.
  • Using contribution in absorption costing, or profit in marginal costing.
  • Mix units that do not add to zero.
  • Splitting for unrelated products without comment.
  • Forgetting that mix and quantity add to volume.

Quick revision

  • Price = actual revenue − actual units × standard price. Volume = unit difference × standard profit (absorption) or contribution (marginal).
  • Quantity = total unit difference × budgeted average. Mix = actual v budgeted-mix units, each at its own standard.
  • Mix + quantity = volume; mix units total zero.

How the marks are earned

  • Table with units and standard values.
  • Check that mix and quantity make the volume variance.
  • Comment on what the mix says about margin.

Practice questions

These are original questions, written in the style of the Skills examination. Work each one before you open the answer.

Recall check: multiple choice

Question 1. The sales quantity variance shows the effect of:

  1. A different price
  2. The total quantity sold differing from budget, in the budgeted mix
  3. Cost changes
  4. A different mix only
Show the answer

B. It uses the budgeted average contribution.

Question 2. The sales mix variance shows the effect of:

  1. A price change
  2. More units overall
  3. A different combination of products from budget
  4. Idle time
Show the answer

C. Units shift between products.

Question 3. The mix variance plus the quantity variance equals:

  1. The sales volume variance
  2. The price variance
  3. Zero
  4. The cost variance
Show the answer

A. They split the volume variance.

Question 4. The quantity variance is valued at the:

  1. Highest contribution
  2. Lowest contribution
  3. Actual contribution
  4. Budgeted average standard contribution per unit
Show the answer

D. Total budgeted contribution ÷ total budgeted units.

Question 5. The mix variance for each product is valued at:

  1. Its own standard contribution (or profit) per unit
  2. The average
  3. The selling price
  4. Zero
Show the answer

A. Products differ in margin.

Question 6. Selling more high-contribution products than the budgeted mix gives:

  1. An adverse quantity variance
  2. An adverse mix variance
  3. A favourable mix variance
  4. No effect
Show the answer

C. The average margin rises.

Question 7. In standard absorption costing the volume variances use:

  1. Contribution
  2. Standard profit per unit
  3. Revenue
  4. Cost
Show the answer

B. In marginal costing they use contribution.

Question 8. The total mix variance in units is:

  1. Positive
  2. Negative
  3. Equal to the quantity
  4. Zero
Show the answer

D. Units only move between products.

Question 9. A mix variance is most meaningful when:

  1. The sales mix can be influenced by management
  2. Products are unrelated
  3. There is one product
  4. Prices are fixed
Show the answer

A. Promotion and pricing can change the mix.

Question 10. The sales price variance is:

  1. Units × cost
  2. Budget × price
  3. Actual revenue − actual units × standard price
  4. Profit − revenue
Show the answer

C. It uses actual units sold.

Section B style: written questions

Question 11 (10 marks). (a) Explain the sales price and volume variances and give TWO causes of each. (6 marks) (b) Explain the sales mix and quantity variances. (4 marks)

Question 12 (15 marks). Budget (marginal costing): X 400 units at ₦25 contribution; Y 200 units at ₦50. Actual sales: X 360, Y 300.

(a) Calculate the sales volume variance for each product and in total. (4 marks) (b) Calculate the sales quantity variance. (3 marks) (c) Calculate the sales mix variance. (5 marks) (d) Comment. (3 marks)

Question 13 (20 marks). A company uses standard absorption costing. Budget: A 500 units, standard profit ₦8; B 300 units, ₦20; C 200 units, ₦35. Actual sales: A 600, B 250, C 150.

(a) Calculate the sales volume variance for each product and in total. (6 marks) (b) Calculate the quantity variance. (3 marks) (c) Calculate the mix variance. (6 marks) (d) Comment on the result and on the use of a volume bonus for sales staff. (5 marks)

Model answers

Show the model answer to Question 11

(a) Price: actual revenue less actual units at standard price; causes: unplanned discounts, competitors’ price cuts. Volume: difference in units sold from budget at standard profit or contribution; causes: change in demand, sales force performance (6).

(b) Quantity: the effect of the total quantity differing from budget in the budgeted mix. Mix: the effect of a different mix of products from budget (4).

Show the model answer to Question 12

(a)

  1. X: (360 − 400) × 25 = 1,000 A.
  2. Y: (300 − 200) × 50 = 5,000 F.
  3. Total ₦4,000 F (4).

(b)

  1. Budget average.
    (10,000 + 10,000) ÷ 600 = ₦33.33.
  2. (660 − 600) × 33.33 = ₦2,000 F (3).

(c)

  1. Budgeted mix X 2/3, Y 1/3: of 660 units, X 440, Y 220.
  2. X: 360 − 440 = 80 A × 25 = 2,000 A.
  3. Y: 300 − 220 = 80 F × 50 = 4,000 F.
  4. Mix ₦2,000 F; check 2,000 + 2,000 = 4,000 (5).

(d) More units were sold and the mix shifted towards the higher-contribution product Y, so both variances are favourable (3).

Show the model answer to Question 13

(a)

  1. A: (600 − 500) × 8 = 800 F.
  2. B: (250 − 300) × 20 = 1,000 A.
  3. C: (150 − 200) × 35 = 1,750 A.
  4. Total ₦1,950 A (6).

(b) Total units 1,000 = budget 1,000; quantity variance nil (3).

(c)

  1. Budgeted mix: A 500, B 300, C 200.
  2. A: 600 − 500 = 100 F × 8 = 800 F.
  3. B: 250 − 300 = 50 A × 20 = 1,000 A.
  4. C: 150 − 200 = 50 A × 35 = 1,750 A.
  5. Mix ₦1,950 A; check (6).

(d) The company sold exactly the budgeted number of units but shifted to the lowest-profit product A, so profit fell short by ₦1,950. A bonus based on the number of units sold would reward the sales team for selling the easy, low-margin product, so bonuses should be based on profit or contribution, or on mix as well as volume (5).

Pathfinder on Sales mix and quantity variances

These are the ICAN Pathfinder questions that test this topic. ICAN owns the questions and the suggested solutions, so we point you to them and do not copy them. Open your Pathfinder, attempt each question under exam conditions, then check your answer against the notes above.

November Diet, 2025: Question 3 (20 marks)

Sales price and volume contribution variances; material price planning and operational variances; labour rate and efficiency; why management cares.

Revise first: Layouts for sales variances

May Diet, 2025: Question 2 (20 marks)

Sales mix and sales quantity contribution variances for a car-wash business; discuss in Nigerian economic conditions.

Revise first: Layouts for sales variances

November Diet, 2024: Question 1 (30 marks)

Price, mix, yield, sales price, market size and share variances; strategy in a declining market.

Revise first: Layouts for sales variances

November Diet, 2024: Question 3 (20 marks)

Sales price, volume, mix and quantity variances for three loaves; budgeted profit.

Revise first: Layouts for sales variances

Source: ICAN Pathfinder, Performance Management. Diets covered: March/July Diet, 2020 to May Diet, 2026. All 13 diets in the Pathfinder are mapped.

Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will check it.

Where this fits

See every past question on Performance Management and the topic each one tests in the Pathfinder question finder.

This course builds on Management Accounting. After it, move on to Strategic Financial Management.

All Performance Management topics

You are reading topic 49 of 77.

  1. Information systems in organisations: role, costs and benefits01
  2. Internet, intranet, wireless technology and networks in business02
  3. Information needs at strategic, tactical and operational levels03
  4. TPS, MIS, EIS, ERP and CRM systems compared04
  5. Social and ethical issues in strategy and the management accountant’s data role05
  6. Big data principles and the big data pyramid06
  7. Big data, data mining and analytics: uses, benefits, challenges and risks07
  8. Activity based costing: cost pools, cost drivers and calculations08
  9. Activity based costing compared with traditional absorption costing09
  10. Target costing: principles and calculating the target cost10
  11. Managing the target cost gap and target costing in services11
  12. Life cycle costing: product life cycle stages and costs12
  13. Life cycle cost and profit calculations, and the benefits of life cycle costing13
  14. Throughput accounting: theory of constraints and the throughput accounting ratio14
  15. Environmental management accounting and sustainability in business15
  16. Environmental costs: methods, challenges and the management accountant’s role16
  17. Relevant costs and revenues, and opportunity cost17
  18. Relevant costs for specific decisions: materials, labour, equipment and overheads18
  19. Break-even analysis and margin of safety for Skills level decisions19
  20. Contribution to sales ratio, target profit and target revenue20
  21. Break-even charts and profit-volume charts21
  22. Multi-product CVP analysis and its limitations22
  23. Limiting factors: allocating a single scarce resource23
  24. Linear programming: formulation and graphical solution24
  25. Linear programming: slack and shadow prices25
  26. Price elasticity of demand and the factors that influence price26
  27. Demand and cost functions: profit-maximising price and output27
  28. Cost-based pricing: cost-plus and relevant-cost pricing28
  29. Market-based pricing: skimming, penetration and other strategies29
  30. Make-or-buy and outsourcing decisions30
  31. One-off contracts, shutdown and further processing of joint products31
  32. Reducing uncertainty: research, simulation and sensitivity analysis32
  33. Expected values and decision rules: maximax, maximin and minimax regret33
  34. Decision trees for multi-stage decisions34
  35. Value of perfect and imperfect information35
  36. Budgetary systems and types of budget: choosing the right one36
  37. Preparing fixed and flexed budgets37
  38. Rolling, activity-based, functional and master budgets38
  39. The beyond budgeting model: benefits and problems39
  40. Participation, negotiation and ethics in budgeting40
  41. High-low method and cost estimation for budgets41
  42. Correlation, regression and time series for budgeting and forecasting42
  43. Learning curve: learning rate and learning effect43
  44. Learning curve in budgeting: steady state and limitations44
  45. Standard costing: uses, how standards are set and types of standard45
  46. Basic variances: material, labour and idle time46
  47. Material mix and yield variances47
  48. Labour mix and yield variances48
  49. Sales mix and quantity variances49 here
  50. Planning and operational variances: revised budget, sales, market size and market share50
  51. Planning and operational variances for materials and labour51
  52. Overhead variances and reconciling budgeted and actual profit at Skills level52
  53. Behavioural effects of variances: motivation, JIT and TQM53
  54. Profitability ratios and financial performance measures54
  55. Liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios55
  56. Non-financial performance indicators56
  57. Short-termism and financial manipulation of results57
  58. Sustainability and ESG performance measures58
  59. The balanced scorecard59
  60. The Fitzgerald and Moon building block model60
  61. Performance measurement in not-for-profit organisations61
  62. Value for money as a public sector objective62
  63. Divisional performance: return on investment and residual income63
  64. Economic value added (EVA)64
  65. Transfer pricing methods and the optimal transfer price65
  66. Transfer pricing: problems, tax and repatriation of funds66
  67. Value chain analysis for performance management67
  68. Complex business structures: alliances, joint ventures and supply chains68
  69. The performance pyramid69
  70. Value-based management70
  71. Corporate failure and life cycle issues71
  72. The Z-score and other quantitative failure models72
  73. The Argenti model and qualitative failure prediction73
  74. Preventing corporate failure and performance improvement strategies74
  75. Current developments in management accounting75
  76. Benchmarking and target setting in the public sector76
  77. The changing role of the management accountant and contemporary issues77
See the whole course

Get the complete Performance Management notes

Download as PDF or Word

  • Every topic as PDF and Word, ready to print
  • Edit it in Word or print the PDF. No retyping.
Get this course

Reading stays free. Access lasts 12 months. Pay by card, bank transfer, USSD or QR through Paystack. Your name and email appear on every page of your files. Read our Refund Policy.

PracticeNext topic