A Nigerian manufacturer wins a large contract, borrows to expand, and then watches three things happen at once: customers return faulty goods, the naira falls and raises the cost of imported inputs, and the managing director, who decides everything himself, ignores the monthly reports. Two years later the company cannot pay its suppliers.
Nobody in the business was surprised in the last month, but many people could have been worried in the first year. Corporate failure is seldom sudden. It has causes that can be named, symptoms that can be seen and, in most cases, remedies that work if they are applied early.
This topic explains the causes and symptoms of corporate failure, the strategies that prevent it, the operational changes a performance management system needs in order to carry out performance improvement, and total quality management with the cost of quality. It builds on the earlier topics on activity based costing and information needs at each level of management, whose techniques and reports several of these strategies use. The next topic covers current developments in management accounting.
In 30 seconds
Corporate failure is the end of a company’s operations because it cannot earn enough or meet its obligations. Causes: economic distress, management incompetence, weak corporate governance, poor technological innovation, bad investment decisions, poor infrastructure, and an unfavourable political or environmental setting. Symptoms: low profitability, high gearing, low liquidity, falling sales and market share, and rising expenditure.
Prevention needs good strategy, operational controls, sound governance, participative management, competent managers, customer focus, good management information and good human resource management. A performance management system carries out improvement through SMART goals, regular feedback, training, recognition and rewards, performance improvement plans and continuous improvement tools. Total quality management aims at customer satisfaction through continuous improvement by everyone, using tools such as Pareto analysis and cause-and-effect diagrams.
The cost of quality has four classes: prevention, appraisal, internal failure and external failure. Full marks come from linking causes to symptoms and to the remedy in the company described.
Why companies fail, and how to prevent it
Corporate failure is the discontinuation of a company’s operations because it cannot earn sufficient returns or meet its obligations. It usually follows weak governance, poor management and bad investment strategy. Companies are assessed for failure risk with quantitative measures (ratios and models such as the Z-score) and qualitative measures (management quality, information flow, creative accounting), which later topics cover.
Causes
- Economic distress. Recession, high inflation, exchange rate falls and weak demand reduce sales and profit and make it hard to pay obligations.
- Management incompetence. Weak control and poor coordination lower performance and raise the chance of failure.
- Weak corporate governance. An ineffective board, poor accountability and a lack of transparency and fairness to stakeholders.
- Poor technological innovation. A company that cannot keep up with new technology becomes less competitive.
- Bad investment decisions. Investments that return too little, especially when financed by borrowing the company cannot service because the project was badly managed.
- Poor infrastructure. Unreliable power, transport, communications and security raise cost and disrupt operations.
- Political and environmental setting. Unrest, policy changes and environmental problems can speed failure.
Symptoms
Low profitability, high gearing, low liquidity, falling sales and market share, and a rising expenditure profile. Non-financial signs include delayed capital expenditure, frozen management salaries, rising staff turnover and falling market share.
Preventive strategies
- Good business strategy, kept under review as the environment changes.
- Operational controls in place and used: budgets, cash planning, costing and credit control.
- Good corporate governance, with an independent, active board.
- Participative management, so that staff understand and own the targets.
- Managerial competence, including depth below the chief executive.
- Customer focus, because customers decide whether the company survives.
- Management information from appropriate systems and equipment, so problems are seen early.
- Good human resource management, with training and retention of skilled staff.
Performance improvement, total quality management and the cost of quality
Operational changes to the performance management system
- Clear, measurable goals. Goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound.
- Regular feedback and open communication, so that problems are raised and corrected quickly.
- Training and development, with resources for continuous learning and no vacancies left unfilled.
- Recognition and rewards for good performance, linked to what individuals control.
- Performance improvement plans for individuals or units who fall short, with a structured approach and regular monitoring.
- Continuous improvement tools: total quality management, activity based budgeting, and an effective management information system, so that the accountant can report progress.
Total quality management (TQM)
Total quality management is a management philosophy of continuous improvement in every part of the organisation, with customer satisfaction as the aim. Everyone from the board to front-line staff takes part. Its principles are:
- a customer focus
- continuous improvement
- employee participation
- process management, since activities are linked
- decisions based on fact
- good supplier relationships
- strategic management of quality objectives
- continuous training
Its tools include quality planning, flowcharts and process maps, statistical process control (control charts and sampling), Pareto analysis (the 80:20 rule, which finds the few causes that give most of the problems), scatter diagrams, cause-and-effect diagrams and customer checklists. Its benefits are better process and product quality, standardisation, error prevention and customer focus. Benchmarking supports it by showing the gap to the best.
The cost of quality
The costs of quality fall into four classes:
- Prevention costs. Costs of stopping non-conforming output before it happens: quality training, design and process engineering, supplier evaluation, testing of new materials, preventive maintenance, and the extra price of better materials.
- Appraisal costs. Costs of finding which units do not conform: inspection of goods received, product testing, inspection of work in progress and of finished output.
- Internal failure costs. Costs of faulty output found before it reaches the customer: spoilage, scrap, rework, and the idle time and machine downtime caused by defects.
- External failure costs. Costs of faulty output found after delivery: warranty repairs, replacements, liability claims, handling of complaints, extra transport, and lost sales through damaged reputation.
Prevention and appraisal are the costs of conformance; internal and external failure are the costs of non-conformance. The central message is that spending more on prevention usually lowers total quality cost, because failure, especially external failure and lost sales, is far more expensive than prevention. A cost of quality report shows each class, its items and its percentage of the total, so that managers see where the money goes.
Cost of quality calculations
- Cost of an item. Quantity (hours or units) × rate. Lost sales cost = units lost × contribution per unit.
- Class totals. Add the items of each class.
- Total cost of quality and percentages. Add the four classes. Class % = class total ÷ total × 100. The percentages add to 100.
- Effect of extra prevention. Failure cost × expected percentage fall = saving. Net benefit = saving − extra prevention cost. Benefit per ₦1 spent = saving ÷ extra cost.
Money is in ₦ million to one decimal place unless stated, and each answer is rounded once, at the end.
Worked examples
Example 1: a cost of quality report. Oyo Motors reports: design engineering 100,000 hours at ₦1,200; staff training ₦4.0m; inspection 300,000 hours at ₦700; product testing ₦1.5m; rework 2,000 units at ₦50,000; warranty repair 2,500 units at ₦55,000; customer support ₦3,000 and transport ₦4,000 for each of those 2,500 units; and 1,800 sales lost through bad publicity at a contribution of ₦200,000 each. Required: a report by class with percentages.
- Prevention.
Design engineering 100,000 × 1,200 = ₦120.0m; training 4.0; total ₦124.0m. - Appraisal.
Inspection 300,000 × 700 = ₦210.0m; testing 1.5; total ₦211.5m. - Internal failure.
Rework 2,000 × 50,000 = ₦100.0m. - External failure.
Warranty 2,500 × 55,000 = 137.5; support 2,500 × 3,000 = 7.5; transport 2,500 × 4,000 = 10.0; lost sales 1,800 × 200,000 = 360.0; total ₦515.0m. - Total.
124.0 + 211.5 + 100.0 + 515.0 = ₦950.5m. - Percentages. Prevention 13.0%; appraisal 22.3%; internal failure 10.5%; external failure 54.2%. Total 100.0%.
- Comment. More than half of the cost of quality is external failure, much of it lost sales that never appear in the accounting records. Prevention is only 13%, so shifting money to prevention is the obvious remedy.
Example 2: the case for more prevention. Using Example 1, the company can spend an extra ₦45.0m on prevention and expects internal and external failure costs together to fall by 20%. Required: the saving, the net benefit and the benefit for each ₦1 spent.
- Failure costs.
100.0 + 515.0 = ₦615.0m. - Saving.
615.0 × 20% = ₦123.0m. - Net benefit.
123.0 − 45.0 = ₦78.0m. - Per ₦1.
123.0 ÷ 45.0 = ₦2.73. - Comment. The plan is attractive, but the 20% is an estimate. The company should test it with a smaller pilot and check that the lost-sales saving is realistic.
Expect variants: a different split of items, lost sales left out of the report, or a request to explain which class each item belongs to.
Just-in-time and the other improvement tools
Management accountants are encouraged to use continuous improvement techniques alongside TQM: just-in-time (JIT) purchasing and production, which cut stock, waste and storage cost and improve cash flow (so reducing the risk of failure through bloated stock and weak liquidity), activity-based budgeting, and an effective management information system that supplies timely data to monitor progress.
Common mistakes
- Listing causes without linking them to the company in the question.
- Confusing symptoms with causes. Low liquidity is a symptom; poor investment decisions are a cause.
- Putting items in the wrong class. Inspection of output is appraisal; rework is internal failure; warranty repair is external failure.
- Leaving out lost sales from external failure when the question gives them.
- Forgetting that prevention reduces total cost.
- Calling TQM a department. It involves everyone.
Quick revision
- Causes: economy, management, governance, technology, investment, infrastructure, politics. Symptoms: low profit, high gearing, low liquidity, falling sales and share, rising costs.
- Prevention: strategy, controls, governance, participation, competence, customers, information, people.
- Improvement: SMART goals, feedback, training, rewards, improvement plans, TQM, activity based budgeting, information systems.
- Cost of quality: prevention and appraisal (conformance); internal and external failure (non-conformance).
How the marks are earned
- State causes or strategies: one mark each with a link to the company.
- Cost of quality report: correct class, correct amount and percentage; show quantity × rate.
- Discuss: link cause, symptom and remedy, and conclude.
Practice questions
These are original questions, written in the style of the Skills examination. Work each one before you open the answer.
Recall check: multiple choice
Question 1. Which is a symptom of corporate failure?
- Strong governance
- Rising market share
- High liquidity
- Low profitability with high gearing
Show the answer
D. Falling sales and low liquidity are others.
Question 2. Which is a cause of corporate failure?
- Bad investment decisions
- Low gearing
- High liquidity
- Growing sales
Show the answer
A. Other causes are weak governance and management incompetence.
Question 3. SMART goals are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and:
- Tax-free
- Secret
- Time-bound
- Rigid
Show the answer
C. They are the base of performance improvement.
Question 4. Total quality management aims mainly at:
- Lower pay
- Customer satisfaction through continuous improvement
- Fewer customers
- Higher inventory
Show the answer
B. Everyone in the organisation takes part.
Question 5. Pareto analysis is based on the idea that:
- A few causes give most of the problems
- All causes are equal
- Nothing can be measured
- Costs never change
Show the answer
A. It is the 80:20 rule.
Question 6. Inspection of finished output is a:
- Prevention cost
- Internal failure cost
- Appraisal cost
- External failure cost
Show the answer
C. Appraisal finds which units do not conform.
Question 7. Rework of defective units found before delivery is an:
- Appraisal cost
- Internal failure cost
- External failure cost
- Prevention cost
Show the answer
B. It is a cost of non-conformance.
Question 8. Warranty repairs are an:
- Prevention cost
- Appraisal cost
- Internal failure cost
- External failure cost
Show the answer
D. Faulty goods were found after delivery.
Question 9. The costs of conformance are:
- Prevention and appraisal
- Internal and external failure
- Rework and scrap
- Warranty and complaints
Show the answer
A. Failure costs are the costs of non-conformance.
Question 10. Spending more on prevention usually:
- Raises total quality cost
- Has no effect
- Lowers total quality cost, because failure is dearer
- Removes the need for customers
Show the answer
C. External failure and lost sales are the costliest.
Section B style: written questions
Question 11 (10 marks). (a) Explain SIX causes of corporate failure. (6 marks) (b) State FOUR strategies a company can use to prevent failure. (4 marks)
Question 12 (15 marks). Ife Industries reports:
- design engineering 80,000 hours at ₦1,500
- staff training ₦5.0m
- inspection 200,000 hours at ₦800
- product testing ₦2.0m
- rework 1,500 units at ₦60,000
- warranty repair 2,000 units at ₦64,000
- customer support ₦4,000 and transport ₦4,800 for each of those 2,000 units
- 1,000 sales lost through bad publicity at a contribution of ₦240,000
(a) Prepare a cost of quality report by class, with percentages. (12 marks) (b) State which classes are the costs of conformance and which are the costs of non-conformance. (3 marks)
Question 13 (20 marks). Using the data in Question 12, management is considering extra spending of ₦40.0m on prevention that it expects to cut internal and external failure costs by 25%.
(a) Calculate the failure costs, the saving, the net benefit and the benefit for each ₦1 spent. (8 marks) (b) Calculate the new total cost of quality. (2 marks) (c) Discuss the principles of total quality management that this plan would need. (6 marks) (d) Explain the operational changes needed in the performance management system to carry the plan out. (4 marks)
Model answers
Show the model answer to Question 11
(a) Any six, with a reason (1 each):
- economic distress lowers sales and profit
- management incompetence gives weak control
- weak governance gives poor accountability
- poor technological innovation loses competitiveness
- bad investment decisions, especially with borrowed money
- poor infrastructure raises cost and disrupts operations
- an unfavourable political or environmental setting
(b) Any four: good business strategy; operational controls; good governance; participative management; managerial competence; customer focus; good management information; good human resource management (1 each).
Show the model answer to Question 12
(a)
- Prevention.
design engineering 80,000 × 1,500 = 120.0; training 5.0; total ₦125.0m (16.4%) (3). - Appraisal.
inspection 200,000 × 800 = 160.0; testing 2.0; total ₦162.0m (21.2%) (3). - Internal failure.
rework 1,500 × 60,000 = ₦90.0m (11.8%) (2). - External failure.
warranty 2,000 × 64,000 = 128.0; support 2,000 × 4,000 = 8.0; transport 2,000 × 4,800 = 9.6; lost sales 1,000 × 240,000 = 240.0; total ₦385.6m (50.6%) (3). - Grand total ₦762.6m (100.0%) (1).
(b) Costs of conformance: prevention and appraisal. Costs of non-conformance: internal and external failure (3).
Show the model answer to Question 13
(a)
- Failure costs 90.0 + 385.6 = ₦475.6m
- saving 475.6 × 25% = ₦118.9m
- net benefit 118.9 − 40.0 = ₦78.9m
- benefit per ₦1 = 118.9 ÷ 40.0 = ₦2.97 (8).
(b) New total 762.6 − 118.9 + 40.0 = ₦683.7m (2).
(c) Any six points:
- customer focus, because failures cost sales
- continuous improvement, not a one-off
- employee participation, since defects arise in everyone’s work
- process management, linking inspection, design and supplier steps
- decisions based on fact, for example Pareto analysis of the main defects
- supplier relationships, because bought-in quality matters
- continuous training (6)
(d) Any four:
- SMART goals for defect rates and returns
- regular feedback
- training in quality methods
- recognition and rewards linked to quality
- improvement plans for weak units
- reports that show the cost of quality by class (4)
Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will check it.